Why are Bulgarian brides so popular?

Bulgaria holds a special place among European countries. It is one of the most recent countries to have joined the EU, but it’s also one of the most culturally diverse and historically peculiar states. Being a member of the EU has its benefits for Bulgarians, but the country is also far from being rich. As a result, many Bulgarian women seek serious relationships and marriage outside of their country.

Bulgarian ladies may be very motivated to marry a foreigner, but it doesn’t mean they will accept just about anyone to be their lawful husband. They prefer men who treat them right and are prepared to give their all to a happy and loyal relationship.

In many ways, dating a Bulgarian woman is similar to being in a relationship with a Russian or Ukrainian beauty. However, there are many important differences between the three nations. Want to know more about your potential Bulgarian bride? Here is a detailed guide to these wonderful women!

Every year hundreds of thousands of Western men travel to Bulgaria to seek for their special someone or finally meet the woman of their dreams they’ve found online. So what makes Bulgarian brides such a popular choice with guys from all over the world? Here are 6 things about Bulgaria women that make them completely irresistible to men.

Family values

Most Bulgarian girls are fine with having fun and dating around for a while, which allows them to get the necessary experience for building a strong relationship with their future husband. However, once they feel they are ready to start a family, they become very serious and focused on their goals.

When you marry a girl from Bulgaria, you can rest assured you will be her top priority no matter what. She will want to spend as much time with you as possible. She will want to find out everything about your views and desires, making sure your needs are met.

Your woman’s family values will become even more noticeable when you start a family. There is no better candidate for having your children than a Bulgarian lady. What’s even more impressive that even after she becomes a mother, she doesn’t stop paying attention to you! The wonderful thing about a Bulgarian woman is that she is able to attend to everyone’s needs all the time.

Appearance

There is no going around this fact — Bulgarian girls are incredibly pretty. Whether you walk the streets of Sofia or browse the fabulous ladies of a Bulgarian dating site, you are guaranteed to be impressed by the looks of these women.

Even though Bulgaria is a coastal country with a sunny climate, the facial features of local girls are very mild. There are some raven-haired beauties with highly contrasting features, but most of them have fair hair and gentle facial characteristics.

One of the things you can’t help but notice about the women in Bulgaria is that they rarely wear heavy makeup. They will use makeup to subtly accentuate their features, but you will never catch a Bulgarian beauty looking like a drag queen in the middle of the day.

Places Mother Goddess Worship

Throughout history, there has been a place of worship for every belief system. Today, places of worship for Muslims are “mosques”, for Christians “churches” and for Jews “synagogues”. Existing before these sky religions, Olympian deities had “shrines” and Mithraism had “caves”.

As mentioned before, there was no special place of worship belonging to Mother Goddess at Catalhoyuk. They were using one part of their houses for religious exercises. They were also cultivating their fields with the aid of bull or ox and sacrificing these animals precious to themselves to the goddesses.

For a man of Catalhoyuk, a house was both shelter and a place of religious practices and a catacomb- burial place- as well. Corpse of a dead family member was kept for days in the garden outside the house. Flesh of corpses was waited to be eaten by wild animals and when only bones remained, it was believed that the dead person was purified of his sins. Bones representing the soul were moved to the house and put under the bed of the spouse. For them, human flesh was “material” and bone was “sense”. When the sinful material was cleaned from pure soul, the soul could now stay at home without damaging anyone.

Worship places in houses were, in the following years, taken out of the houses. The society who reached the understanding of symbiosis, sharing and urbanism in the course of time felt the necessity for a separate worship place for Mother Goddess. Afterwards, temples for goddesses started to be built. Incoming tribes of Anatolia also had an impact on the process of goddess­es’ getting out of houses and beginning to stay in temples. Then Mother Goddess belief showed permanence all around Anatolia.

Writing starts to be used in Mesopotamia of Sumerians around 4000 BC. The invention of writing is also regarded as the beginning of history. Until Sumerian and Egyptian civilizations came into existence, the only land to be mentioned under the name of “civilization” was “Anatolia”.

Anatolian man who has switched over to production on this civilized land since 7.500s BC created his sole goddess with an in­sight that braces his time. That is, within the time from 7500 BC to 4000 BC, in a sense before the civilizations beginning to emerge with the advent of writing and polytheistic religions, the mono­theistic goddess belief prevailed in Anatolia for 3.500 years.

The period of polytheistic religions in Anatolia begins to make itself feel with the Hittites. After the Hittites bring natives of Anatolia together in military union, they proudly add Anatolia’s Mother Goddess called by diverse names to the Hittite deities.

Though thousands of new gods and goddess join Mother Goddess, as long as peoples exist, they always rank the Mother Goddess as foremost.

UEFA had the option to remove Bulgaria

Bulgaria was punished Tuesday for the Nazi salutes and racist chanting of its soccer fans with an order to play a European Championship qualifying game in an empty stadium, although the team avoided expulsion from the competition. He punishment was criticized by anti-discrimination groups, who said it was too lenient.

UEFA had the option to remove Bulgaria from the Euro 2020 playoffs in March, after the incidents in Sofia at a qualifier against England this month.

“We are disappointed that Bulgaria will not be expelled from the Euro 2020 qualifying competition given their previous record, and obvious inability to deal with the problems they face,” said the Fare group, UEFA’s anti-racism partner which flags high-risk games for monitoring.

Anti-racism organization Kick It Out said it was “disheartened, but not surprised” by the ruling and urged UEFA to rethink a process it said produced sanctions which did not work.

“In our view, they have missed an opportunity to send an uncompromising message on racism and discrimination,” the London-based body said.

Bulgaria fans made Nazi salutes and targeted monkey noises at England’s black players during a 6-0 loss two weeks ago. The game was twice stopped by the referee following UEFA guidelines to address discrimination.

playlist error: This content is currently unavailable from within your country.

The UEFA disciplinary panel also put Bulgaria on probation for two years, which should include most of the 2022 World Cup qualifying program. A repeat offense will trigger a stadium closure for a second competitive game.

The Bulgarian soccer federation was fined 85,000 euros ($94,000), including the mandated 50,000 euros ($55,500) for a second charge of racist behavior. A charge of fans throwing objects was also proven.

Although the England game was the third time Bulgaria fans were guilty of racist behavior this year, the previous incidents at back-to-back Euro 2020 qualifiers in June were judged together in July.

UEFA’s disciplinary code states a team will be punished for a second offense with “one match played behind closed doors and a fine of 50,000 euros.”

A third offense “is punished with more than one match behind closed doors, a stadium closure, the forfeiting of a match, the deduction of points and/or disqualification from the competition,” according to UEFA rules.

The soccer players’ union in England suggested a lack of ethnic representation among the 10 men on the UEFA disciplinary committee “will influence the way in which racist incidents are dealt with.”

“Diversity on the pitch must be reflected at every level of the game, not just on the field of play,” the Professional Footballers’ Association said.

The verdict could be challenged at UEFA’s appeals committee by independent disciplinary inspectors who worked on the case if they decide it was too lenient.

Fare said it “will be in touch with UEFA to explore options and maintain that Bulgaria and others in the same situation fundamentally reappraise how they deal with racism.”

ulgaria’s next home game is against the Czech Republic on Nov. 17.

The stadium closure will likely cost the national soccer body at least 100,000 euros ($110,000) in lost revenue. Bulgaria drew about 5,000 fans for home games against Kosovo and Montenegro, then more than 17,000 to see England.

Bulgaria is last in Group A with no chance to advance to Euro 2020 by finishing in the top two places.

However, the sanctions do not affect Bulgaria’s second chance to reach the final tournament from the playoffs in March. Potential opponents in the first round of the playoffs include Iceland and Scotland.

Turmoil in Bulgaria since the game led to soccer federation president Borislav Mihailov and national team coach Krasimir Balakov — players on the 1994 World Cup semifinalist team — being ousted.

A UEFA charge of Bulgaria fans causing disturbance during the national anthem for England accounted for 10,000 euros ($11,100) of the 85,000 euros ($94,000) fine.

The English Football Association was fined 5,000 euros ($5,500) for a similar charge.

UEFA had the option to remove Bulgaria

Bulgaria was punished Tuesday for the Nazi salutes and racist chanting of its soccer fans with an order to play a European Championship qualifying game in an empty stadium, although the team avoided expulsion from the competition. He punishment was criticized by anti-discrimination groups, who said it was too lenient.

UEFA had the option to remove Bulgaria from the Euro 2020 playoffs in March, after the incidents in Sofia at a qualifier against England this month.

“We are disappointed that Bulgaria will not be expelled from the Euro 2020 qualifying competition given their previous record, and obvious inability to deal with the problems they face,” said the Fare group, UEFA’s anti-racism partner which flags high-risk games for monitoring.

Anti-racism organization Kick It Out said it was “disheartened, but not surprised” by the ruling and urged UEFA to rethink a process it said produced sanctions which did not work.

“In our view, they have missed an opportunity to send an uncompromising message on racism and discrimination,” the London-based body said.

Bulgaria fans made Nazi salutes and targeted monkey noises at England’s black players during a 6-0 loss two weeks ago. The game was twice stopped by the referee following UEFA guidelines to address discrimination.

playlist error: This content is currently unavailable from within your country.

The UEFA disciplinary panel also put Bulgaria on probation for two years, which should include most of the 2022 World Cup qualifying program. A repeat offense will trigger a stadium closure for a second competitive game.

The Bulgarian soccer federation was fined 85,000 euros ($94,000), including the mandated 50,000 euros ($55,500) for a second charge of racist behavior. A charge of fans throwing objects was also proven.

Although the England game was the third time Bulgaria fans were guilty of racist behavior this year, the previous incidents at back-to-back Euro 2020 qualifiers in June were judged together in July.

UEFA’s disciplinary code states a team will be punished for a second offense with “one match played behind closed doors and a fine of 50,000 euros.”

A third offense “is punished with more than one match behind closed doors, a stadium closure, the forfeiting of a match, the deduction of points and/or disqualification from the competition,” according to UEFA rules.

The soccer players’ union in England suggested a lack of ethnic representation among the 10 men on the UEFA disciplinary committee “will influence the way in which racist incidents are dealt with.”

“Diversity on the pitch must be reflected at every level of the game, not just on the field of play,” the Professional Footballers’ Association said.

The verdict could be challenged at UEFA’s appeals committee by independent disciplinary inspectors who worked on the case if they decide it was too lenient.

Fare said it “will be in touch with UEFA to explore options and maintain that Bulgaria and others in the same situation fundamentally reappraise how they deal with racism.”

ulgaria’s next home game is against the Czech Republic on Nov. 17.

The stadium closure will likely cost the national soccer body at least 100,000 euros ($110,000) in lost revenue. Bulgaria drew about 5,000 fans for home games against Kosovo and Montenegro, then more than 17,000 to see England.

Bulgaria is last in Group A with no chance to advance to Euro 2020 by finishing in the top two places.

However, the sanctions do not affect Bulgaria’s second chance to reach the final tournament from the playoffs in March. Potential opponents in the first round of the playoffs include Iceland and Scotland.

Turmoil in Bulgaria since the game led to soccer federation president Borislav Mihailov and national team coach Krasimir Balakov — players on the 1994 World Cup semifinalist team — being ousted.

A UEFA charge of Bulgaria fans causing disturbance during the national anthem for England accounted for 10,000 euros ($11,100) of the 85,000 euros ($94,000) fine.

The English Football Association was fined 5,000 euros ($5,500) for a similar charge.

Early Middle Age Period of Bulgaria

The territories of most European states, including Bulgaria, took shape in the early Middle Age Period. Only the lands of modem Italy and Germany are an exception; they became state territories in the second half of the 19th century. In most cases, the causes of wars were the defense of territories already possessed, rather than the taking control of new ones with a foreign population. Medieval Bulgarians lived under the impression of occupying vast territories, which they usually referred to as “Upper Land” (Moesia with the lower flows of the rivers Timok and Bulgarian Morava, as well as the plains up to the Carpathian Mountains) and “Lower Land” (Thrace, the Aegean coast and present-day Macedonia). In the period 4th centuries, the Bulgarians who were the most numerous people in the Balkan Peninsula, settled permanently in their ethnic lands.

The territory from the Black Sea to the Adriatic Sea and from the Wallachian Lowland to the Aegean Sea has an area of about 240,000 square kilometres and is the biggest territory of the Bulgarians in

Southeastern Europe. Until the end of its medieval statehood (the end of the 14th century), Bulgaria was among the first five European monarchies in terms of territory – together with Russia, Byzantium, France and the Holy Roman Empire (the latter often being a conglomerate of semi-dependent feudal kingdoms).

As in Antiquity, in the Byzantine and in the Bulgarian medieval periods and during the modem era, the population on the coasts of the Black Sea, the Sea of Marmara and the Aegean Sea is not mono-ethnic. It is usual to encounter bi-ethnic and bilingual or multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic coasts with an official language, which is the one of the mling state. The above-mentioned coastal parts played the role of a contact zone for the interior regions. It is there that cultures and civilisations meet for the first time and continue to live together. Contact zones are the spaces of synthesis where urban culture accumulates the latest achievements of the period.

Until the emergence of Danube Bulgaria (681), the Bulgarians and the Slavs lived around water basins and used to cross them. Their river and sea culture was not only their livelihood but also brought in military aggression. Fanagoria (present-day Kerch), the capital of Kubrat’s Bulgaria lay in a very important strategic and commercial place – by the sea. On the other hand, the indigenous sea culture was, no doubt, quite strong. So it is normal to expect that as early as the beginning of the 8th century under Kan Tervel (700-721), Bulgaria, which already controlled the western Black Sea coastal area to the north of the Balkan Mountains, would initiate a purposive policy of colonization of the lands to the south of the Balkan Mountains. In 705, the Bulgarian mler obtained the region of Zagore (between the towns of Sliven, Yambol and the Black Sea) from Justinian II (685-695; 705-711). In 716, Theodosius HI (715-717) ceded new territories in the south to Bulgaria. They bordered on Mount Strandzha to the east.

The occupation of the coastal areas to the south of the Balkans became stable under Kan Krum (802—814). In 812, the Kan conquered Debelt and the Black Sea I ports of Anhialo, Sozopol and Nesebar. It j should be mentioned that Nesebar, which is on a peninsula, was taken by siege. It is not possible to think that it was taken along the narrow strip of firm land (now artificially built) without the attack of Bulgarian ships from the sea side. In fact, the ships are depicted on the walls of Pliska and later in Preslav and other parts of the Bulgarian northeast. Thus the south direction of advancement towards the Aegean Sea began. In the same year, 812, Kan Krum reached the important town of Philipi on the Aegean coast near present-day town of Kavala.

Early Middle Age Period of Bulgaria

The territories of most European states, including Bulgaria, took shape in the early Middle Age Period. Only the lands of modem Italy and Germany are an exception; they became state territories in the second half of the 19th century. In most cases, the causes of wars were the defense of territories already possessed, rather than the taking control of new ones with a foreign population. Medieval Bulgarians lived under the impression of occupying vast territories, which they usually referred to as “Upper Land” (Moesia with the lower flows of the rivers Timok and Bulgarian Morava, as well as the plains up to the Carpathian Mountains) and “Lower Land” (Thrace, the Aegean coast and present-day Macedonia). In the period 4th centuries, the Bulgarians who were the most numerous people in the Balkan Peninsula, settled permanently in their ethnic lands.

The territory from the Black Sea to the Adriatic Sea and from the Wallachian Lowland to the Aegean Sea has an area of about 240,000 square kilometres and is the biggest territory of the Bulgarians in

Southeastern Europe. Until the end of its medieval statehood (the end of the 14th century), Bulgaria was among the first five European monarchies in terms of territory – together with Russia, Byzantium, France and the Holy Roman Empire (the latter often being a conglomerate of semi-dependent feudal kingdoms).

As in Antiquity, in the Byzantine and in the Bulgarian medieval periods and during the modem era, the population on the coasts of the Black Sea, the Sea of Marmara and the Aegean Sea is not mono-ethnic. It is usual to encounter bi-ethnic and bilingual or multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic coasts with an official language, which is the one of the mling state. The above-mentioned coastal parts played the role of a contact zone for the interior regions. It is there that cultures and civilisations meet for the first time and continue to live together. Contact zones are the spaces of synthesis where urban culture accumulates the latest achievements of the period.

Until the emergence of Danube Bulgaria (681), the Bulgarians and the Slavs lived around water basins and used to cross them. Their river and sea culture was not only their livelihood but also brought in military aggression. Fanagoria (present-day Kerch), the capital of Kubrat’s Bulgaria lay in a very important strategic and commercial place – by the sea. On the other hand, the indigenous sea culture was, no doubt, quite strong. So it is normal to expect that as early as the beginning of the 8th century under Kan Tervel (700-721), Bulgaria, which already controlled the western Black Sea coastal area to the north of the Balkan Mountains, would initiate a purposive policy of colonization of the lands to the south of the Balkan Mountains. In 705, the Bulgarian mler obtained the region of Zagore (between the towns of Sliven, Yambol and the Black Sea) from Justinian II (685-695; 705-711). In 716, Theodosius HI (715-717) ceded new territories in the south to Bulgaria. They bordered on Mount Strandzha to the east.

The occupation of the coastal areas to the south of the Balkans became stable under Kan Krum (802—814). In 812, the Kan conquered Debelt and the Black Sea I ports of Anhialo, Sozopol and Nesebar. It j should be mentioned that Nesebar, which is on a peninsula, was taken by siege. It is not possible to think that it was taken along the narrow strip of firm land (now artificially built) without the attack of Bulgarian ships from the sea side. In fact, the ships are depicted on the walls of Pliska and later in Preslav and other parts of the Bulgarian northeast. Thus the south direction of advancement towards the Aegean Sea began. In the same year, 812, Kan Krum reached the important town of Philipi on the Aegean coast near present-day town of Kavala.